I was thinking the other day about my use of these two terms, practice and repetition, and wanted to spend some time thinking about what the actual distinction between the two is that I’m trying to make. I tell my Aikido students that they need to practice the technique and not just repeat what they were doing before, but I realized that there is no inherent difference between these two words. Or there is, but maybe the distinction I’m trying to make isn’t so clear.
I like this definition for the word, practice: “repeated performance or systematic exercise for the purpose of acquiring skill or proficiency.” So the word and the concept of repetition is in this definition, and there is certainly this need of echoing, or of doing a thing over and over again, but I guess the difference to me is the quality of what one is repeating over and over again. The point I made the other night, and the point that I’d like to make here, is that improving over time is very difficult. In the short term it’s pretty easy to improve. There is just so much to learn that as long as a person shows up at a dojo with some regularity, they are going to learn. But over time there is nothing new, the information has kind of been presented in one way or another, and this is when I think the real practice begins. There is a moment when Aikido training needs to go from pure repetition to something more subtle, and this subtle thing is what I’m calling practice.
I’ve seen people who have done Aikido for many years, but that time spent on the mat isn’t really evident in their movement. It’s almost like at some point their bodies stopped changing, their technique stopped changing, and nothing really progressed past a certain point. I realize that this is a pretty critical thing to say, but it is based on my observations over time. They must have repeated technique many, many times, but in that repetition something was missing. Some key ingredient wasn’t there that would lead to some larger change, and I think that element is the difference between these two terms, repetition and practice. It is important to acknowledge that there are specific physical limitations that we bring to our training, and it might be unfair to say that someone isn’t practicing because they haven’t reached some perceived level of mastery. I don’t mean to suggest that this is purely a physical manifestation of the training. Although I do believe that this is a part of it, it isn’t the only part.
There is something in Aikido that is different than any other martial art I’ve ever experienced. There is a nuance to it, a sophistication to it that is unparalleled. I remember the very first Aikido classes I ever took; it must have been in the late eighties or early nineties with my Aunt at the dojo where she was training. I’m not sure how much I got out of the class, but it was wild to watch her hurling people across the room and for me to do some basic Aikido. I’ll be honest, I didn’t get it. I saw it, but it didn’t really make sense to me. Maybe three or four years later I watched an Aikido class with Kanai Sensei and even then I didn’t get it. Whatever it was that was going on in Aikido was lost on me. Several years later I came across Aikido again, and I was determined to figure out what I was missing. I started training at Valley Aikido in Western Massachusetts where a good friend of mine was at the time. It took me a while to kind of get up to speed, but I remember training with some black belts and realizing that there was something there, some quality that I just couldn’t quite put my finger on that was so powerful, so smooth and fluid and so painful in some ways that really inspired me. There was something there, and I could not figure out what it was. There was some quality underneath the kata, underneath the rote learning that was really indescribable and something I couldn’t really see with just my eyes. I think it was that feeling that hooked me to Aikido for so long.
When I tested for shodan I realized quite clearly that I did NOT have that quality to my practice. I knew I was strong, I knew the techniques, but that indescribable feeling wasn’t part of my practice. I had a moment of panic one day on the mat when I asked myself “what if I never get it?” I wondered, what if I trained my whole life and I never quite got that feeling? I really applied myself to my practice at that time in a way that I hadn’t before. I remember feeling like a charlatan at first. I new I didn’t deserve the hakama, and it took me a while to actually wear it. It wasn’t until my teacher finally got annoyed with me that I started wearing a black belt and the hakama. But for me, I think that helped me push a little harder through many years of difficult training because I knew there was this quality out there that I wanted to have in my body. I knew I couldn’t read about it in a book, or understand it cognitively, but it was something that I had to feel in some way.
I think one of the differences between repetition and practice is just this. It’s just some feeling or sense like we are trying to find an illusive quality in the technique. It’s almost like listening very, very closely to something, or a very keen use of all of the senses to try and find some illusive quality. Always listening as closely as possible, seeing detail after smaller detail after smaller detail; to try and engage completely on the mat and to be what can only be described as “mindful.” I think this is the way, or a way, to find this illusive quality and to engage with Aikido in a way that will reveal the more esoteric elements of the practice. I ask my students to avoid repeating technique, to avoid just doing the same old thing they’ve done before, and to find something new each time. I ask them to look at things very closely, listen, feel and sense for an entire hour, or two or three, however long we are training for. I think if we repeat these qualities, then we are practicing Aikido.
The problem is that we don’t necessarily train this way in the short-term, this makes the long-term training more difficult, and there seem to be several factors that contribute to this. One thing that I’ve seen is that people have a hard time listening to and repeating what it is the teacher is demonstrating. During seminars it seems that many people aren’t really used to a teacher correcting some part of a technique and then trying to apply that correction. What is more common is that a teacher makes a correction, and people continue to do what they’ve always done; it’s almost like their technique is locked into place. I’m sure the technique is good, but there doesn’t seem to be an ability to add in new elements, or take out some others, or just rearrange things a bit a least just for the class. Granted, this is no easy task, but I think that this is the very essence of practice. I remember being at a seminar not too long ago, and the instructor was asking if everyone could practice silently. He stopped the class a few times and explained, and I thought very well, why it’s a good idea to practice in silence. Even after that, even after stopping the class several times to make this point, people were still talking. I think this is an example of how we can get lulled into a repeat, repeat, repeat mindset and can kind of stop practicing after a while.
The term shodan (first degree black belt) traditionally referred to someone who was at the beginning of their training, but in the West we’ve come to identify this with mastery of an art. In Aikido they say that reaching shodan means that you are ready to start practicing. That this “first level” means that you know all there is to know in a cognitive way, and now it’s time to understand what all of that means in a deeper way; maybe a physical or sensory way as opposed to purely cognitive. At least, that’s my interpretation, and this is the nature of practice to me. As we reach this first stage we try to take concepts and apply them in order to create some deeper meaning.
In this country, I think we take black belt to mean something like mastery. This puts quite a bit of pressure on a person who earns a black belt to then be a “master.” I think this can limit our ability to grow if it’s not used the right way. It’s hard to keep learning, it’s hard to admit you don’t know something when you’re supposed to be a master. If this were to push us to improve I’d be all for it, but in my experience this has the opposite effect. Instead of inspiring, this perceived mastery has a tendency to intimidate us and has the potential to create a kind of front, and Aikido façade. We get good enough at a technique and then want to make it work exactly the way we’ve learned to make it work and can kind of lose some flexibility in our thinking. We figure out some element of the technique that makes it function, and since we are now masters of Aikido we have a tough time saying “wow, I’m not sure I know how to do that technique.”
I’m sure there are many other factors that create limits to our training, and these are just a few. What is clear is that we become what we repeat, and the nature of what is repeated is what I’m calling practice. If we repeat nothing then that’s what we get. If we repeat what we learned when we were 3rd kyu, then that’s what our technique will be like. If we repeat brutality, anger and fear then that’s what we will show up. Calmness, unity, compassion, power, flexibility; these are all words that I’d like to have associated with my Aikido practice and these are the tenets of Aikido that I try to instill in my students. But these things don’t just show up one day without some effort, or without repeating it day after day after day. So we need to add something into this repetition, and what we add in I think is important. Looking, and looking and looking again for something else, for something new, for something that might be hidden beneath the surface; this is what can start to change our technique even after years and years of training.
What I like about Aikido is that there is something to search for. This isn’t a dig at any other martial art, but when you see someone smash their fist through a cement block, or watch someone pick up another human being and drop them on their head, you kind of get it. It’s really fun to watch, and the mastery needed to accomplish these feats is clear, but there is no mystery to it. You can get it immediately. Aikido is just not at all like that. You watch it, at least I did, and you think; “what in the world are these people doing?” But then you try it and you feel something, and there you are tapping like crazy or lying on the ground and you wonder how exactly you got there. And years and years go by and somehow you can still find yourself lying on the ground wondering what exactly happened.
Now that I’m the chief instructor and other people look to me for an example I see how important it is that I keep looking, keep searching for this illusive and mysterious quality and to encourage my students to do the same. In reality, and I hope I can say this without revealing too much of my ego, I’m quite good at what I do. I’m not sure that I’m anything special, but I’ve worked very hard to be where I am and I think that shows in my technique. However, I see that there is no way that I can stop. I can’t just say, “that’s it. I’m done. I’ve gone as far as I’m going to go.” I guess I could say that, but that isn’t very interesting, is it? So I have to keep looking, keep searching for that feeling, that sense, that thing that is in Aikido but is so hard to reveal, and this is what I think can turn a mundane repetition into an active and lifelong practice.
